Review: Connectives as Discourse Landmarks, by Agnes Celle and Ruth Huart (eds.)
نویسنده
چکیده
In the volume under review, papers by eleven authors are included which were presented at the international conferenceConnectives asDiscourse Landmarks (University of Paris-Diderot, May 2005). emain point of interest of present studies are syntactic, semantic and pragmatic functions of several discourse connectives in English. e term ‘connective’ is being used in a broad sense, without specific theoretical restrictions, herewith opening space for different treatments of discourse. In the book, this term covers not only traditional connective items like conjunctions (and, but) and relative pronouns (which), but also discourse adverbials (rather, still, yet), phrasal constructions (aer all) as well as whole sentential frames (the fact is that; it’s not that; A because B so A’) andmeans of contact (well, you know). As this set of connectives shows, the studies deal with two large aspects of discourse research: with questions of syntax, semantics and lexicology, understanding connectives as items expressing the relations between sentences (abstract objects, events), andwith pragmatics where connectives are understood as units linking the speaker and the hearer. e editors’ introduction describes briefly the historical context of present-day discourse studies, making short references to RichardG.Warner, Deborah Schiffrin and Jan-OlaÖstman. Further, it explains the development of the discourse terminology and touches upon some open questions of the discourse research, namely the level of grammaticalization of connectives, the issue, whether for the meaning of connectives, their core lexical sense is more important or rather pragmatic sense variance in different contexts and, finally, the relation between the form (conjunctive, subjunctive) and themeaning of connectives. Aer general remarks ondiscourse, the main points of the studies included are shortly summarized. In the “Part I. Connectives andmodality”, Raphael Salkie (“Connectives, modals and prototypes: A study of rather”) focuses on common features of different senses of rather (connective,
منابع مشابه
Annotating Discourse Connectives In The Chinese Treebank
In this paper we examine the issues that arise from the annotation of the discourse connectives for the Chinese Discourse Treebank Project. This project is based on the same principles as the PDTB, a project that annotates the English discourse connectives in the Penn Treebank. The paper begins by outlining range of discourse connectives under consideration in this project and examines the dist...
متن کاملComputing Discourse Semantics: The Predicate-Argument Semantics of Discourse Connectives in D-LTAG
Abstract. D-LTAG is a discourse-level extension of Lexicalized Tree-Adjoining Grammar (LTAG), in which discourse syntax is projected by different types of discourse connectives and discourse interpretation is a product of compositional rules, anaphora resolution, and inference. In this paper, we present a D-LTAG extension of ongoing work on an LTAG syntaxsemantic interface. First, we show how p...
متن کاملMachine Translation of Labeled Discourse Connectives
This paper shows how the disambiguation of discourse connectives can improve their automatic translation, while preserving the overall performance of statistical MT as measured by BLEU. State-of-the-art automatic classifiers for rhetorical relations are used prior to MT to label discourse connectives that signal those relations. These labels are used for MT in two ways: (1) by augmenting factor...
متن کاملAcquiring a Disambiguation Model For Discourse Connectives
Discourse connectives can show sense ambiguities, in that they can signal more than one possible rhetorical relation. The aim of this study is discover how to disambiguate such discourse connectives using a statistical model. Six discourse connectives (after, as soon as, before, once, since and while) which show ambiguities in the sdrt (Segmented Discourse Representation Theory (Asher & Lascari...
متن کاملAutomatic Disambiguation of French Discourse Connectives
Discourse connectives (e.g. however, because) are terms that can explicitly convey a discourse relation within a text. While discourse connectives have been shown to be an effective clue to automatically identify discourse relations, they are not always used to convey such relations, thus they should first be disambiguated between discourse-usage and non-discourse-usage. In this paper, we inves...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Prague Bull. Math. Linguistics
دوره 88 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007